Current:Home > MarketsInstagram video blurry? Company heads admits quality is degraded if views are low -ClearPath Finance
Instagram video blurry? Company heads admits quality is degraded if views are low
View
Date:2025-04-19 19:02:28
Instagram posts looking a little blurry lately? That may because the company reserves top quality video based on content popularity, the head of Instagram recently admitted.
Adam Mosseri, head of the social media app, revealed in a user-driven “Ask Me Anything” that the quality of the video rendered for a reel or story posted to Instagram can change over time.
Whether the video looks crisp or blurry depends on its reach.
“If something isn’t watched for a long time — because the vast majority of views are in the beginning, we will move to a lower quality video — we will move to a lower quality video,” Mosseri says in the screen-recorded clip. “And then if it's watched again a lot then we will re-render the high quality video.”
The topic has been discussed extensively on Threads in the last few days and has also been reported on by a number of news organizations, including The Verge.
The goal, according to Mosseri, is to “show people the highest quality content that we can" but some worry the tactic prevents content creators with a smaller audience from being able to compete against those more popular than them, and impacts the quality of their content as a result.
Mosseri also explained that a slow internet connection is another instance in which a lower quality video may be shown.
“We’ll serve a lower quality video so that it loads quickly as opposed to giving them a spinner. So, it depends. It’s a pretty dynamic system,” Mosseri said.
Change in quality ‘isn’t huge,’ Instagram head says
Mosseri’s video response was to an Instagram user asking: “Do stories lose quality over time? Mine look blurry in highlights.” The topic migrated over to Threads on Friday, where it was discussed further.
“Now I know why my old videos look like I’m filming with my microwave,” one user wrote.
Mosseri addressed the online forum a day later, writing in a reply that the rendering “works at an aggregate level, not an individual viewer level.”
“We bias to higher quality (more CPU intensive encoding and more expensive storage for bigger files) for creators who drive more views. It’s not a binary threshold, but rather a sliding scale,” according to the post.
Mosseri said the concern was warranted but “doesn’t seem to matter much” in practice, he wrote in a separate post.
“The quality shift isn’t huge and whether or not people interact with videos is way more based on the content of the video than the quality,” Mosseri said. “Quality seems to be much more important to the original creator, who is more likely to delete the video if it looks poor, than to their viewers.”
Users were left unsatisfied with Mosseri’s additional statements, with some writing that the platform’s tactic may actively deter content creators who are just starting out and haven’t built a large enough audience.
“It was demotivating factor, especially when you are specifically VIDEO CREATOR and QUALITY is one of the factors why people will follow you,” another user wrote. “So that’s a pretty real concern for a beginner video creator.”
veryGood! (297)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- 'Most Whopper
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore